Author Archives: wx

Snow is here – how much?

Friday a.m. 1/22/2016

Updates and adjustments

This morning’s computer runs have continued the southern route, even more than I thought.  Nevertheless, snow has been coming down prettily for the past couple of hours.  The other, more significant, change is the increased forward speed of the storm.  According to the models, the primary energy is already pushing into the Appalachians.  Heaviest bands of snow, etc. have already pushed east of I-75.  That means the 8″-12″ snows expected south of Louisville toward Bowling Green will probably not materialize.  But, 12″+ plus still looks like a good bet over southeastern KY.

With the primary energy pushing eastward so quickly, that will shorten the time we’ll be under a moderate snow cover.  Last night, the target time for the heaviest snow was expected to be between Noon and 6 P.M.  Now, the models are pointing toward the best chance for heaviest snow to  be ending by 1 or 2 P.M.  After that we’ll see mostly light to occasionally very light snow through early evening. Snow should be ending by 7-8 P.M.

Radar trends are already showing diminishing trends to the snow locally.  That should hold through the afternoon.  Even though this is a huge storm system, with the primary energy production moving east, we’red stuck with the leftovers.  Still plenty of moisture left, but for us the dynamics to produce heavy snow are weakening.

But, I have revised my forecast for snow upward a bit.  Louisville area should see an accumulation of 2″-4″

More in a few hours.

Has Goldilocks left the forecast?

Thursday afternoon, Jan. 21,2016

(update to get my fairy tale character correct.  Who knows, maybe this whole blog is a fairy tail.  TW)

In my years following major winter storms, I’ve noticed they bunch into two major storm tracks.  One I’ll call the northern track the other will be the southern track.  The most common for us is the northern track storm which forms east of the Rockies, slides into Texas then curves northeast.  Quite often these come right up the Ohio Valley.  That sends the heaviest snows over central and northern Indiana while we’re left with some snow changing to rain.  The southern storms form over southeastern Texas then move ENE across the Gulf States.  The northern edge of these sometimes spreads precipitation as far north as the Ohio River.  Often the snow only reaches into southern KY.  The long-term climatology of the area shows these two storm tracks account for a huge majority of our winter storms.

Once in awhile, we get a “Goldilocks Storm”.  One which takes a track roughly halfway between the two favored tracks. These have been big snowmakers.  Remember last March?  Goldilocks Storms require everything (for us) to be “just right.”  Early this week, it looked as though Cinderella was going to pay us a visit.

Things changed yesterday (check yesterday’s blog for more details) when the models started shifting toward a more common southern track.  Today’s runs have solidified into a traditional southern storm – the GFS and NAM are in remarkable agreement.  This is a very large storm, so there is still a good chance that snow will move into northern KY/southern IN.

What to expect.

1). The southern half of KY can still expect some major icing late tonight changing to snow tomorrow morning.  Heaviest snow accumulations(6″-12″)  will occur over southcentral KY then SE KY, southern WV and VA.

2).  Louisville area.   Snow should not arrive here until late morning.  If we’re going to see any heavy snow it’ll be between Noon and 6 P.M.  Snow will taper to flurries during the evening.  Along the Ohio River and 20 miles south of the river snow accumulations should run 1″-3″ .  Accumulations increase rapidly south and southeast of Louisville (E’town, Bardstown, Lex should be 4″-6″.)  Accumulations over southern Indiana will be small and not get too very north of the river.

So, that’s the way I see it shaping up now.  It’s subject to change, of course.  Tonight’s runs may change things again.  And, don’t look for any hope from the European and Canadian models.  They are farther south.  We’ll be lucky to get one inch if they are correct!

So, has Goldilocks left the neighborhood?  Not yet, but she has her coat and scarf on…and is heading toward the door.

 

 

How much snow?

Thursday morning, 1/21/2016

Quick update after a glance at morning GFS and NAM model runs.  The trends remain the same as yesterday afternoon’s update mentioned – the primary storm track still looks to be on a track too far south to bring the really heavy snows as far north as the Ohio River.  Things are running a little slower as snow may hold off until around late morning or Noon tomorrow. (Makes the Winter Storm WARNING going into effect at 7 P.M. tonight look rather silly, doesn’t it? )

Still looks about the same – 3″- 5″ or 6″) in Louisville area.  Rapidly increasing totals up to 6″-12 south of the metro (across central KY).  Rapid drop in accumulations north of the Ohio.

More later.

Was today’s snow just a practice for Friday?

Wednesday afternoon. 1/20/2016

Pretty, light and fluffy snow overnight and this morning left a coating of 3″ on my driveway and 4″ at the airport.  Similar totals around most of the area.  We’ve been talking about the main event this week being Friday’s expected storm, but today’s snow has raised the bar a bit.

There have been some interesting changes in the models since yesterday’s runs.  The most prominent one is that both the GFS and the NAM have dropped the system farther south.  Yesterday, they had the axis of heaviest snowfall right over the Ohio Valley while today they have the Ohio River just inside the northern edge of the snowfall shield.  There’s likely to be a sharp drop off in snow along the northern extreme of the precipitation area, so that’s a very important development.  Another interesting result from the morning’s runs is that, even though they’ve made the southern shift, the models haven’t changed their snow forecasts for us – generally 6″ – 10″.

To me,  that’s a very surprising development, one that doesn’t make a lot of sense.  There’s another problem – the storm diving over the Rockies is expected to eventually “cut off” from the main band of westerlies and drift slowly eastward and then get re-absorbed into the upper flow and become a huge east coast storm for the middle Atlantic states.  The time while it drifts over the southern states will be when it will have it’s greatest effects on us.  That drift was expected to be very slow, putting us in its path for a longer time.  The GFS is still predicting that, but the morning NAM ejects the system much quicker eastward, thus diminishing the duration of snow.

There’s no question that this storm will be able to tap into a vast supply of Gulf Moisture.  But, it seems the biggest question for us is “How far north will the moisture come?”

So, it’s obvious the Friday’s weather is still “up in the air” so to speak.  Tonight’s and tomorrow’s model runs should go a long way toward resolving the situation.  Until then, here’s my current thinking…I believe the shift to a more southerly storm track will, in general, hold.  I believe that the  GFS and NAM will come to a compromise over the evolution of the cut off low’s ejection eastward.  If it works that way, the axis of heaviest snowfall will be over southern KY/northern TN and go ENE from there.  thus the heaviest snows should fall from Nashville and Bowling Green to southeastern KY, West Virginia, northern MD, southern PA and New Jersey.  The western half of that area could see snows in the range of 6″-12″ while the eastern half could reach 12″-20″ or more.  That puts us on the northern side of the heavy snow axis, an area which should see rapidly diminishing snow totals northward from Bowling Green.  For the Louisville area, my current outlook would be in the 3″-6″ range (higher south and east, lower north and west).

That’s it for now.  I’ll be back tomorrow…probably with a completely different story.

 

 

Snow is close

11 P. M. Tuesday, Jan. 19,20016

Brief snow update

Evening data coming in is showing slightly higher precipitation totals for overnight and tomorrow morning.  Also, a slight change in timing.

Forecast update:  snow – 3 A.M. – 10 A.M.

snow accumulation:  2″ – 4″  (Louisville area)  higher totals south and west of                                                                                     Louisville.

 

Sunny this afternoon…blanket of white by morning

Tuesday afternoon, January 19, 2016

Little change in the outlook today.  Models have done a flip-flop with the NAM now a little stronger than the GFS.  But, the system drifting toward us remains a weak one, so the biggest question remains, “How weak?”

Did you notice this morning that even though we had a clear, calm night and temperatures were down to about 10 degrees, there was no frost on rooftops or lawns.  That’s a testament to how dry our air is now.  The approaching system is coming from the WNW, so it’s not going be able to pick up pick Gulf moisture.  Luckily, the system does have a good supply of mid-level moisture to produce snow.  Unluckily, a lot of that snow will evaporate before it reaches the ground.  As that snow evaporates, however, it moistens the lower level air.  Eventually, the snow works its way to the ground.  And, that’s the key to tonight’s snow…how much snow will be left to fall after it finally starts reaching the surface?

We’ll probably start falling aloft over Louisville before midnight, but it looks like we won’t start seeing it hit the ground until around 4 A.M.  Snow is likely to continue until about 10 A.M., so that gives us roughly six hours of snow to work with.  Unfortunately, the models show a gradual weakening of the system overnight, so the snow we are going to miss (Mid-4 A.M.) should be more than the snow we will get later (8-10 A.M.).

One more thing to consider…that cold air.  That really changes the so-called snow ratios.  Under normal conditions (temperatures near 32 at surface and slightly warmer air aloft) the usual snow ratio is 10 to 1.  (One inch of water content will produce about a 10″ snowfall.)  Very wet snows can have ratios as low as 7 or 8 to 1 while very dry, fluffy snows can reach ratios as high as 20 to 1 (or higher).  This snow will have a high ratio.  So, a little moisture can go a long way.

So, for the next 24 hours, here’s what I expect…clouds roll in this evening with virga (that’s the snow aloft) showing up overhead (as seen on radar) before Midnight.  Snow starts around 4 A.M. and diminishes by 10-11 A.M.  Total snow accumulation: 2″- 3″ for the Louisville area.  Snow accumulations will gradually increase as you go south and west of Louisville.  The western third of the state should see 4″ – 6″ of snow.

Road conditions should be very messy (snow and ice) for morning rush hour but should return to near normal for the evening rush hour.

What about that late-week storm?
Good question, if I must say so myself.  All signs are still pointing toward a major winter weather event around the lower Ohio Valley Thursday night and Friday.  Models keep making adjustments to this storm as it begins to move over the northwestern states.  It’s strong enough to create havoc from coast to coast over the next 3-4 days.  But exactly what it’s going to bring us is still a question.  But, the most recent model runs still put us in line for some major snow.  The GFS has now upped it’s forecast to 8.2″.  But as close as 100 miles south of us, the forecast is for mostly rain.  And, trying to pinpoint something like that 2 to 3 days in advance is very difficult.  It has been my observation over the years that the GFS tends to be too far south initially with these systems and gradually brings them farther north with time.  As small a shift as 100 miles in the storm track over the next 48-72 hours could change a major snow into a cold winter rain.  It’s just too early to tell.  Stay tuned.

Still looks good for snow this week!

Monday afternoon, Jan. 18, 2016

There have been some changes since yesterday (see Sunday’s post) with the models, but nothing big enough to downplay our snow chances yet.

NAM and GFS are now closer together concerning the weak upper air disturbance crossing the midwest and Ohio Valley Tuesday night and Wednesday.  In fact, today’s runs have the NAM now more aggressive than the than the GFS.  Their current forecasts are now in the 2″-4″ for the NAM and 1″-3″ for the GFS.  More on this system tomorrow.

Meanwhile, both models continue to point toward Friday as this week’s MAIN EVENT.  A system developing over the southern Rockies is expected to develop into a large storm over the southcentral U.S. then travel over TN and up the Appalachians Friday.  That’s prime territory for deep snows for us.  It’s too early to predict an exact path, but this morning’s GFS is predicting 6.8″ of snow for Louisville.

Let’s wait and see!!!

Two good shots for snow this week.

Sunday,  Jan. 17, 2016

A few flurries arriving this afternoon along with another shot of Arctic air will set the stage for what could turn out to be a snowy week.  The first good chance will arrive Wednesday while the second seems to be on tap for Friday.  The current GFS model looks pretty impressive, but I’m always forced to use the disclaimer – A lot can change in a few days.  But, it’s always fun to speculate.  So here goes…

A weak to moderate disturbance will drift into the Ohio Valley by Wednesday.  It’ll be overriding the cold air mass arriving today, so surface moisture will be very limited.  Nevertheless, the GFS is trying very hard to generate its own moisture and is showing the potential for 2″-3″ of snow.  The NAM is much weaker with this system, but still shows the potential for an inch (possibly as much as two) of snow.

Friday’s system, at this point, looks to be stronger and have more moisture available.  Thus, the snow-making potential could support 4″ + accumulations.  But, there will be some hurdles to jump over before a deep snow can occur.  What happens Wednesday will go a long way toward determining what’s going to happen Friday.  If Wednesday’s system is as strong as the GFS suggests, it’ll drag in another surge of cold air and help support a larger snow on Friday.  The weaker NAM solution plays toward a rain/snow mix early Friday, then snow later.  Either way, it looks as though Friday’s system will be warmer, so it shouldn’t be as bad on the roads.

Of course, potential doesn’t often equal reality.  But, it looks pretty good at this time.  Check back for updates as the events draw closer.

Observations from this week’s snows

Thursday, Jan.14, 2016

The two snows this week pointed out a couple of interesting items: (1) The time and temperature that snow falls is very important and (2) the difference between “snowfall” and “snow accumulation.”

First, according to airport (SDF) data, the two systems had approximately the same liquid water content, so all things being equal we should have had about the same results.  But, we certainly didn’t.  Sunday’s snow fell during rapidly falling temperatures (from above freezing into the 20’s.  The warmer roads, at first, melted the snow.  As it got colder, the roads froze into icy sheets with a thin layer  of snow on top.  Meanwhile, the snow which fell onto the grassy areas didn’t melt (because of no solar radiation at night) and accumulated up to around an inch locally. If that snow had fallen during the day, the result would have been much like what we saw Tuesday.

Tuesday’s snow arrived around daybreak, so it didn’t have the advantage of night to get a jump on accumulations.  Plus temperatures were above 32 degrees.  That snow continued most of the morning, including a strong snow shower around 11 A.M.  That snow shower, if it had occurred around, say, 6 or 7 A.M., would have created a huge mess on the roads.  But, it happened during the day and the roads just stayed wet.

Now, the snowfall vs. accumulation.  This can be confusing because when we forecast snow, we talk about the expected accumulation – how much will my ruler measure on a flat, NON grassy surface.  However, the National Weather Service reports two measurements- snowfall and snow accumulation.  As we saw this week, the two are NOT the same.

Sunday morning’s snow (at night) was right in line with expectations – the weather service reported .8″ of snowfall and 1″ on the ground.  Accumulations are rounded to the nearest inch, so a measured “on the ground” .5″ to 1.4″ would be reported as 1″, etc.

Tuesday, however, was a much different story.  The “official” snow on the ground at 7 A.M. was 1″.  Then came the snow.  It was daytime and temperatures were above 32.  The snow”fall” total reported by the NWS was 1.8″.  At 1 P.M. the officially reported accumulation on the ground was listed as 0.

Good illustration of the difference between snowfall and snow accumulation – we started with one inch on the ground, then a snowfall of 1.8″.  After it was over, we had less than a half inch of snow on the ground.

NOTE:  Situations like this allow almost everybody to proclaim a “correct” forecast.  Monday night, the NWS and many others forecast an accumulation of 1″-2″.  I wasn’t watching Tuesday evening, but based on past experiences, I’d say that a common comment went something like this…”just like we predicted, we had 1.8″ of snowfall…”  They may proclaim to be “correct”, but they were wrong!  And they are trying to convince you they were right.  So, if you are keeping score – give them two strikes instead of one.

There is a difference between snowfall and snow accumulation. although many times forecasters wish you didn’t know.

 

NOTE:  I don’t know why, but this post today brought to mind an old story circulating about our old “climate specialist” Al Gore.  As you probably know, back in 2007 or so, Al famously announced to the world that due to global warming,  the Arctic would be ice-free (In summer) and the polar bears would have vanished by 2013 or 2014.  Well, here we are in 2016 and the Arctic still has plenty of ice and polar bears.

The comment:  When Al Gore was born, Earth had 7000 polar bears.  Now there are only 30,000 left.

 

 

 

 

More Snow?

Monday, Jan. 11, 2013

Another Winter Weather Advisory for the area.  Yesterday turned out different than I expected as temperatures dropped much faster than I was expecting, so there were plenty of road problems in spite of the less than an inch (.8″) that was recorded at the airport.

Tonight’s situation is entirely different…we’ll be on the tail end of what is commonly called an Alberta Clipper that will move through the Great Lakes late tonight and tomorrow.  There’s not usually too much to get excited about south of the clipper’s path, but this time may be a little different – at least the NWS seems to think so.  Me, I’m not so sure, but I do think we’ll get something tomorrow morning.

This evening and early tomorrow morning, we’ll probably see what appears to be lots of snow  on the radar, but don’t be fooled.  High levels will be producing snow, but the lower level air is too dry for it to reach the ground.  The result is called virga (falling precipitation that evaporates before reaching the ground).   It looks good on the radar, but the result is disappointing to snow lovers.

That virga over night will be from a weak upper air disturbance preceding the primary clipper system.  While it shouldn’t produce more than a few flakes of snow, it will serve to increase the low level moisture levels so that the primary system should have more chance to drop some snow.

As mentioned above, the major problems with the clipper will be far to our north, but the cold front trailing the system will come racing across Indiana and Kentucky tomorrow morning.  While the atmosphere is very cold right now, it’s hard to squeeze much moisture into the air.  But, it should be able produce a few hours of snow (probably between 6 and 10 A.M. in the Louisville area (earlier to our west and later to our east).

All the models I’ve seen are generating only small amounts of precipitation (less than .10″ liquid), so that doesn’t hint at much snow.  Also, temperatures are expected to remain in the lower 30’s tonight, so the roads should be able to handle it pretty well.

With the Winter Weather Advisory, the Weather Service (and most of our media sycophants) is predicting 1″-3″ of snow.  The indicators don’t look that strong to me.  It’s possible that a few scattered snow showers could produce a few isolated swaths of 1″-2″ of snow (especially over southern Indiana).  The vast majority of the area should see anywhere from a dusting to up to an inch of snow.